A liberal activist group has pledged one million dollars to defeat Susan Collins, nominal Republican senator from Maine, against ANY candidate that runs against her, IF she votes for Judge Kavenaughs’ confirmation to the supreme court. You can see that story here, and you should read it to illuminate yourself on what EXACTLY the left will do to get its’ way.
Says a Collins spokesperson “And
anybody who thinks these tactics would work on Senator Collins obviously
doesn’t know her,” spokeswoman Annie Clark said in a statement. “Senator
Collins will make up her mind based on the merits of the nomination. Threats or
other attempts to bully her will not play a factor in her decision making
whatsoever.”
Au contraire. Anybody
that knows senator Collins and her voting record has EVERY reason to believe
that senator Collins would cave into such pressure….she DID after all vote
against the repeal of Obamacare, because she maintained that it would endanger
the “right” of women to abort a living person right up until the time it
started crying outside of the womb…..even though the repeal of Obamacare, like
Obamacare itself, had no such provision or stipulation. Senator Collins is only SLIGHTLY less left
than the late Senator McCain….and though she is NOT facing re-election in
November, having a million dollars working against you for two years is a
powerful incentive. Collins, who is NO
fan of President Trump and never a reliable conservative vote, a million bucks
is a serious threat.
And Collins office considers the threat a bribe and she
should. If Collins cotes no to Kavenaugh
then the million dollars will not be spent. So, the million is only available
to her future opponent if she votes yes. That is something of value offered in
return for something of value and that meets the legal definition of a bribe.
Unnnnnllllllessss you are the inappropriately named “Citizens
for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.”
That organization claims that the deal does NOT equal a bribe because there
is “no agreement”. I suppose that
offering money in return for a service is not considered an agreement. Or maybe the “Citizens for Responsibility and
Ethics in Washington”……is no such thing.
WHO are these people after all?
Well, to hear them tell it, the “Citizens” are “nonprofit 501(c)(3) and
nonpartisan U.S. government ethics and accountability watchdog” organization. You need to know that THAT is a lie…..and an
easily disprovable lie. The “Citizens
for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington”, is a spin off of David Brocks’ “Media
Matters”…..one of several, who are directly aligned with the democrat party for
the sole purpose of selling the democrat message through smearing any opposing
voice, and which rakes in MILLIONS of dollars, 100% of which goes to democrat
candidates after Brock and company takes their cut, which is significant. IF YOU CARE, Sheryl Atkisson lays out Brocks
tentacles fairly clearly in her book “The Smear”, and you should NEVER, EVER,
E-V-E-R think that anything with Brocks’ name on it is anything other than a
left wing attack dog.
So, in this story, you have a candidate who is NOT
completely reliable as a conservative vote, who DOES have a record for not
voting the will of her constituents, who is up for re-election after the
midterms, being offered a bribe by an unscrupulous group, which won’t call it a
bribe because there is no “agreement” (I suppose a threat is not as bad as an
agreement), in order to prevent the confirmation of a judge who by all accounts
has an impeccable reputation as a constitutional judge.
A constitutional judge.
I have referenced that before, right? That the last thing that the left wants is a constitutional
judge.
Will this criminality be allowed? I dunno…..is Hillary still walking free? Is Lois Lerner enjoying retirement on your
dime? Is Peter Strozk free? Eric Holder?
No, nothing will be done about this….but rest assured….at the end of the
day, if Susan Collins does not vote yes on Kavenaugh….
……well then…..
….She was bribed.
No comments:
Post a Comment