So, you are a grad student, which puts you in your 20’s. PRESUMABLY that makes you a fairly smart person
(though there is plenty of evidence these days that you may be a liberal, know
nothing, asswipe). As an adult, of legal
age, you share an apartment with two peers.
Those peers decide to search your room one day, violating what courts
have REPEATEDLY ruled to be your 4th amendment, inviolate rights,
and discover one or more weapons that you legally own, and are licensed to
have/carry. Those two snowflakes shit
their fruit of the looms, confront you on your gun ownership, report you, for a
violation of nothing, to apartment management, which then evicts you.
Can’t happen? Bet
me.
This story is so unbelievable, not that it happened in
America, that is becoming more and more believable as we see the rise of a
generation with absolutely no roots in reality….but that it happened at all.
I mentioned above that the courts have repeatedly ruled
that your room in a hotel, your house, your room in an apartment (separate from
a common area), is YOUR space and as such, protected by the Constitution. Granted that protection is from government in
any form, but it has also been extended to unwarranted searches by management,
and by extension your idiot roommate’s.
And their reasons for searching the roommate’s room? Well hell…..she was from Alabama so they just
figured that she must have something.
So….you searched her room for no other reason than you
figured she may have something? You were
looking for nothing particular, you just thought she might have something? Booze?
Drugs? Money? What would you have done if you found
something OTHER than guns? Report her
for booze? Still a legal product, still
owned legally by a legal person…..so what then.
Of course that explanation is bullshit, it is all bullshit….but that is
the argument that these two pansies used to have their roommate evicted.
Oh, on the eviction issue.
The management says that the eviction is for no other
reason than because it makes the other tenants uncomfortable. Wonder why he didn’t evict THEM? Who knows what will make them uncomfortable
next? A republican in the apartment next
door? And to rub salt in the wound the
management said that the young lady being wronged here would be FURTHER wronged
by being held accountable for the lost rents of the people that moved out
because of their fear of guns.
I suppose management would go to court to ask for financial
redress. That would be a good thing,
because if I were the student, management would be in court already for violating
my rights.
WHAT sort of jacked up adults are we raising? You know what scares me? Guns don’t scare me….assholes with guns
SHOOTING at me, with me not able to shoot back….THAT scares me. People breaking in my house, waking me up
before the alarm goes off, and me with no gun…THAT scares me. Having a Mexican drug lord holding a blow
torch to my nads….THAT scares me….but the existence of a gun, a gun in my
presence, a legally trained, fully authorized gun owner, THAT does not scare
me.
Apparently I need to add sissie leftists to the list of
crap that scares me. And check this
out; “We discussed with Leyla that all of us are
uncomfortable with having firearms in the house, and that their presence causes anxiety and deprives us of the quiet
enjoyment of the premise to which we are entitled,” one roommate wrote
in an email obtained by the Washington Free Beacon (emphasis my own). When in the HELL did “quiet enjoyment” become
an entitlement for which you could infringe on anothers rights?
NOW YOU SEE why arguing, nay, discussing things with a
liberal is so difficult. Their heads are
SO far up their ass that normal people can LITERALLY not find a starting
point. How do you argue with authority
(the property management), that understands that you are lawful, legal, in
accordance and have violated NO laws or rules, but throws your ass out anyhow,
not being political of course, because someone else is scared?
How?
Lawsuit baby……this young lady should drag the lot of them
in front of the court…..a real one, not the ninth circuit.
No comments:
Post a Comment