It is EXCEPTIONALLY difficult to have a civil conversation
with people that have checked out from reality (or never checked in, for that
matter). For example, this morning my FB
friend Chris Leko Stang posted a conversation, complete with screen shots (good
job) of a conversation that she had with a pro-abortionist (euphemistically
called “pro-choice” as “pro-murder” is
little too descriptive). Chris’
position was that abortion was murder, one I share with her. He “friend” took the position (and I say it
like that as if it was a debate; the woman didn’t “take” the position, she
believed it) that abortion could not be murder because it was “legal”.
Would this be the place to point out things that were
considered “legal”, but the label of “legal” didn’t make it something that it
wasn’t? Slavery for instance…..that was
legal….and today nobody but Muslims and African savages see it as “right”. It is still human trafficking. When the Nazi’s were tear assing through
Europe, it was perfectly legal to march Jews in the occupied nations off to
death camps. It was still murder, but it
was legal (Ironically, in Germany itself, if a Jew was accused of committing a
crime, he or she was required to undergo a trial…one in which he or she would
be found guilty and marched off to a death camp in an occupied country to be
murdered. All perfectly legal….still
murder.
You see, you can’t discuss things in any sort of rational
manner with people who just don’t have any sort of moral, ethical compass and
do not see things for what they are.
That the woman did not understand that making it LEGAL, did not negate
it as murder was (I suspect intentionally) beyond her grasp, or willingness to
admit.
Here is a great example.
This week I heard Elizabeth Warren, still not disavowing
her claim to Native American roots, on a minor rant about the Presidents’
National Emergency declaration. When
asked if she could think of something that would be an ACTUAL national
emergency (because evidently the left and their information ministry, the MSM
do not see an invasion as an ACTUAL national emergency), she immediately
responded that she could. She proceeded
to list a. Student Loan Debt, b. Income inequality and c. Gun violence.
Wow…..I wonder how she missed jaywalking?
Now, this comment from Warren is telling. Aside from the fact that she comes across as
a shrill, angry bitch, her comment shows that she doesn’t understand the issue
or is just lying (you never really know with the left). But get your acorn around this…here is a
woman, running to be the socialist candidate for President of the United
States, and she doesn’t consider unfettered, leftist sponsored immigration into
the country, which IS tantamount to an invasion, regardless of how often the
democrat leaders try to discount it….see?
They are speaking a different language…..SHE does not see that as a
national emergency. However, she DOES
consider student debt a national emergency.
Those two are not even in the same league; she is not comparing apples
to oranges…..at least both of those are fruits.
She is comparing fact and truth with what she wants fact and truth to
be……and that is not the same thing. And,
as a side note, Warren, and any democrat could be President for Life, and not
address the student debt issue…..while making open borders some sort of “human
right”.
Just like abortion isn’t murder, because the government says
it is legal. Still murder. Student debt is not anywhere close to being
the same as illegal immigration.
Abortion is murder, student debt is NOT a national emergency. You can cure the student debt issue by not
loaning money to people going to Berkley to get a degree in African American
Feminist Under Water Basket Weaving Justice; don’t DO anything, just stop doing
stupid things.
Trump isn’t Hitler, abortion is not “not murder” because it
is legal, student loan debt (a multi-generational financial debacle that would
stop FAST if the government didn’t ensure the loan) is not a national emergency
and unfettered, illegal immigration will destroy the United States.
And you will never convince a liberal of facts.
Yeah, I all too often attempted, though it was utterly futile, to use common sense, facts, and logic to persuade liberals online. Yeah.
ReplyDelete