The Big Lie....and its' Big Liar

I would say that ONLY the Washington Post could produce a piece of crap “journalism” like this article….but hell, this is the post factual media world….so who the hell knows?  I could be very wrong.

Isaac Stanley-Becker, in the UK, has penned what may be the most intellectually dishonest piece, among his many, on Congressman Mo Brooks, a republican from Alabama.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/gop-congressman-quotes-hitlers-mein-kampf-to-slam-trumps-adversaries-as-liars/ar-BBVeMtE?ocid=ientp

Long, crappy story short, Brooks was attacking the left on their two year long use of the “big lie”, origins of which are to be found in Adolf Hitlers “Mein-Kampf” (later also used by the lefts’ ultimate hero, Joseph Stalin).  In essence, one tells a lie BIG enough, often enough……and eventually the drumbeat of the lie will convince many listeners that it is true.  For Hitler, the big lie was that the Jews in Germany were responsible for the loss of the First World War.  Clearly that was a lie and part of preparing the way for the outright murder of six million or more European Jews.

Somehow, dishonestly, Stanley-Becker finds a problem with the big lie theory being leveled at the left and the media, given that, in his mind, you cannot accuse the left of the big lie and anti-semitism at the same time.  And clearly that is not the case.

The left is perfectly capable of being anti-semitic and using the big lie…..without breaking stride.  More than a few of the animals elected to congress in 2018 are openly anti-semitic.  And if you have two brain cells to rub together, you know that for two years the left has been piling on the big lie of Trump-Russia collusion.  This is the party, the “movement” that has no problem with murdering innocents on the day of birth, but oppose the needled for a murderer; dichotomous thinking has never been an issue for the left….it is damned near a requirement.

But there is one paragraph in the article that, if EVERYTHING ELSE was true as written, this paragraph would show the writers bias and lack of intellectual integrity.

“It’s true that the so-called big lie is an expression made famous by the Nazis, who were not socialists in any meaningful sense, despite having “National Socialist” in their party’s title. But the Nazi-era accusation gained currency in the Third Reich because it was deployed by Hitler and his followers to depict Jews as traitors to the German nation. The Nazi dictator used the term to blame Jews for propagating the idea that German Gen. Erich Ludendorff, a notorious anti-Semite who had been Paul von Hindenburg’s chief deputy, was to blame for Germany’s defeat in World War I”.

“It’s true that the so-called big lie is an expression made famous by the Nazis, who were not socialists in any meaningful sense, despite having “National Socialist” in their party’s title”.  THAT is an outright lie.  There is no dispute among any educated person in the world that the NAZI’s WERE SOCIALIST.  That sentence right there is so historically and analytically incorrect as to call into doubt ALL of the rest of the article.  And, it makes clear that Stanley-Becker, despite being a PhD student, knows not of what he speaks.

Remember this….you are a socialist ONLY until you can move to communism, the ultimate goal of all socialists.  Can there be part of socialism in successful western nations?  So far there is no evidence of if (and please do not use the failed experiements in Sweden and Denmark).  But if the left has its’ way, socialism with ALL of its’ life draining force, will be here in full form…..along with anti-semitism.

To deny that is to buy in to a big lie.