Libtardation and the Election of Trump

So, we excise California and New York from the body politic, and I know a lot of people that would like to do just that, and Trump beat Hillary by three million popular votes……a number to which the left has clung to tenaciously as evidence that the Trump victory (which looks more and more like a landslide with each leftist effort to discredit it) is an aberration, an abomination and not representative of the nation as a whole.  And this has been explained to the left, and to the media (same thing), repeatedly; not only is this not the way the game is played (by the rules), but KNOWING this, Hillary played even THAT game poorly.  Same system that has worked since the founders wrote it down…..but because the left lost, and because Trump was the republican that won (as much of a republican as he is), the system is broken.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4055182/Final-tally-shows-Trump-lost-popular-vote-2-8-million-BEAT-Clinton-3-million-votes-outside-California-New-York.html

And be honest with yourself……if you are voting democrat you don’t know shit anyhow, haven’t read the Federalist Papers, know nothing of Constitutional Law (or law in general) and are just an uneducated, whiny, selfish shit…..so a discussion of the electoral college is probably beyond you….so you are not arguing Trumps illegitimacy from a position of intellectual strength.  But for the record…..the electoral college was NOT designed to protect slavery.  I suppose that if you have formed that opinion from whole cloth and need something to support it (I think that is the way the leftist decision process works), then you could connect the dots in your own mind…but that wasn’t the case.  And, also for the record, the 3/5ths compromise was not intended to preserve slavery either.  All of the great signatories realized that they were going to have to deal with slavery and make it go away and it was the south that insisted it be in a shooting war.  No, the electoral college was SPECIFICALLY designed to keep heavily populated states, like New York and California from imposing their will on the rest of the nation.  Now, the SOLUTION to getting what the democrats want out of this election is a constitutional amendment…..and they will never get it.  I suppose the Supreme Court can always put a liberal spin on Article II, like they did on Obamacare in declaring it a tax, but I don’t see that happening.

And I see these idiots marching around with their signs.

“Make My Vote Count!!!”

It did, now shut up and sit down and put up with what the taxpayers have been doing for a miserable eight years.

“Vote your conscience!!”  This one is especially insulting as it implies that non-liberals DID NOT vote their conscience.  

And, even it mattered…that is not the way it went.

“Election was unfair!!!” 

Probably…..ask the people of Detroit.

And when you can get to a liberal on their level, which is somewhere short of kindergarten, they will show that they DO indeed understand the EC, but THIS TIME it didn’t work…..because their pants’ suit leader didn’t win. 

And that is the bottom line; Hillary didn’t win so something is wrong.  I would argue that something IS wrong…with California and New York.

Trump didn’t even campaign in California, a state so deeply in debt and so firmly in the leftist, globalist camp, that if it were its’ own country would be worse off than Venezuela.  He KNEW he was not going to win.  And Hillary, who was NEVER in any trouble in California, campaigned and spent heavily on a state that was safely hers.  The same in New York.  Trump sent a little time in the state, he IS after all a New Yorker, and the truth is that, outside of NY City, a city which is basically a welfare state under Deblasio.  If a few burroughs in NYC had swung the state could have been his because NYC and Albany are the huge blue suckholes of the state.  But he was never going to win and Hillary was never going to lose.

Yet, Hillary spent huge in two states that were never in question, never going to vote for Trump.  If EVERY SWINGING DICK in both states had voted for Hillary, she would have STILL lost in the EC……and THAT was what the EC was made to prevent, which is exactly what the nut sacks are protesting.  In THIS election they are perfectly comfortable in saying that yes, two states with VERY little in common with the other 48 should decide what, and who is best for all 50.  She played an established game, with established rules…..and did it badly, and lost.

And then, lost in Jill Steins’ recount.

And then, lost when the Constitution was upheld in the Electoral College.

And she will lose when Trump takes the oath of office in January.

For once, at the hands of the Clintons, the Clintons are the losers.